Transparent destination comparison

Compare 2027 eclipse locations

Select two to five locations to compare totality duration, Sun altitude, approximate path margin, access, accommodation, relocation flexibility and viewing environment. Climate remains separate until its historical dataset is ready.

The comparator does not hide the decision inside one mysterious ranking. Open the score components to see exactly where every available point comes from.

Longest totality

Luxor

6m 25s at the stored city-center coordinate.

Viewing-score balance

Luxor

93 / 100 with the historical climate layer included.

Access + lodging

Málaga

Highest combined structural access and accommodation baseline in this comparison.

The full 100-point comparison includes the August 2001–2025 NASA POWER solar-clarity and mean-temperature proxies. Historical climate is not an eclipse-day forecast. Structural access scores are planning baselines, not live travel advice.
FactorMálagaSpainGibraltarGibraltarTarifaSpainLuxorEgypt
Eclipse typetotaltotaltotaltotal
Totality1m 50s4m 29s4m 41s6m 25s
Peak Sun altitude39.3°38.4°38.1°81.8°
Sun azimuth96.8°95.5°95.2°195.8°
Approx. path margin8 km inside70 km inside83 km inside113 km inside
AccessibilityHigh92/100 baselineHigh80/100 baselineMedium63/100 baselineHigh82/100 baseline
AccommodationHigh92/100 baselineHigh76/100 baselineMedium66/100 baselineHigh91/100 baseline
Relocation flexibility84/10055/10070/10066/100
Viewing environment72/10076/10090/10094/100
Solar clarity proxy94.9%95.3%95.3%98.9%
August mean temp.24.9°C24.0°C24.0°C32.7°C
August mean humidity70%76%76%21%
Viewing score68 / 100All 100 points available80 / 100All 100 points available79 / 100All 100 points available93 / 100All 100 points available

Málaga

Major tourism base with strong transport and lodging depth; moving farther south-west can materially increase totality.

Calculated at 36.7213°, -4.4214°. Path margin uses an interpolated NASA centerline width and is approximate; local eclipse type/timing comes from Astronomy Engine.

Gibraltar

Compact and accessible, with strong totality, but the territory itself offers limited room for last-minute relocation.

Calculated at 36.1408°, -5.3536°. Path margin uses an interpolated NASA centerline width and is approximate; local eclipse type/timing comes from Astronomy Engine.

Tarifa

Smaller destination with excellent open-sky/coastal viewing potential and strong totality duration, but less transport capacity than major cities.

Calculated at 36.0143°, -5.6044°. Path margin uses an interpolated NASA centerline width and is approximate; local eclipse type/timing comes from Astronomy Engine.

Luxor

Purpose-built tourism infrastructure near exceptionally long totality and broad open-desert viewing options; heat remains a separate climate factor.

Calculated at 25.6872°, 32.6396°. Path margin uses an interpolated NASA centerline width and is approximate; local eclipse type/timing comes from Astronomy Engine.

Show score components
ComponentMálagaGibraltarTarifaLuxor
Totality duration7.2 pts17.6 pts18.3 pts25.0 pts
Path margin1.9 pts8.0 pts8.0 pts8.0 pts
Sun altitude3.7 pts3.6 pts3.6 pts7.0 pts
Accessibility11.0 pts9.6 pts7.6 pts9.8 pts
Accommodation7.4 pts6.1 pts5.3 pts7.3 pts
Relocation flexibility4.2 pts2.8 pts3.5 pts3.3 pts
Viewing environment3.6 pts3.8 pts4.5 pts4.7 pts
Solar clarity proxy23.8 pts23.8 pts23.8 pts24.8 pts
Mean-temperature comfort5.0 pts5.0 pts5.0 pts3.4 pts

How to compare eclipse destinations

Start with eclipse type and totality duration. Then check path margin and Sun altitude. After the astronomy, compare durable practical factors such as accessibility, accommodation depth and your ability to relocate if later forecasts favor another part of the path.

Why some comparisons show a score out of 70

The full Eclipse Viewing Score uses 100 points. Seventy points come from astronomy and durable planning factors: totality duration (25), path margin (8), Sun altitude (7), accessibility (12), accommodation (8), relocation flexibility (5) and viewing environment (5).

Historical sky conditions account for 25 points and heat comfort for 5. When verified historical climate data is unavailable for a location, those 30 points remain visibly unscored rather than being estimated.

What the score cannot know

A structural score is not a live travel forecast. It does not know future hotel availability, traffic, border queues, ferry disruption, temporary road closures or eclipse-day clouds. Those conditions should be checked close to travel and kept separate from stable astronomical geometry.

Useful comparison sets

  • Málaga vs Gibraltar vs Tarifa: convenience against deeper western-path totality.
  • Gibraltar vs Tangier: two sides of the Strait with different transport and relocation options.
  • Luxor vs Jeddah: extreme totality duration against very strong gateway access.
  • Oran vs Sfax vs Luxor: how the North African path changes as it moves east.

Do not treat the highest score as a command

The score is a decision aid. You may value totality duration more than lodging, or easy access more than a few extra seconds. The components remain visible so you can make that trade-off yourself.

What to calculate next

If you already know your base location, use Totality Gain to measure whether moving is worthwhile. If your base is partial, use Totality Finder first.